Site Logo

Native Teams Review 2026: Pricing, EOR Coverage, Global Payroll, Pros, and Cons

Last Updated: 26 Jun 2026
Aleksandra Jotic
HR Strategy & Operations Advisor | HRIS, Training & Organisational Development
Built with HR and software expert input using a structured evaluation process
View more
Advertising Disclosure

Native Teams is a strong fit for cost-conscious startups and SMBs that need an affordable way to hire employees in Europe or pay global contractors, offering one of the lowest published EOR list prices on the market at $99 per employee per month. [20] [25] It is less suited for mid-market and enterprise organizations that require deep HRIS integrations, an open API, or heavily automated workflows across complex global entities. [14] [19]

Strengths

  • Highly affordable EOR pricing ($99/mo), embedded multi-currency wallets and expense cards.

Limitations

  • Complete lack of an open API, missing native HRIS integrations, and partner-dependent coverage outside Europe.

Best for

Startups and SMBs hiring in Europe

Native Teams provides highly affordable EOR and contractor payments for budget-conscious startups, particularly those expanding within Europe.

  • Micro
  • Small
  • SMB
  • EOR
  • Contractor Payments
  1. Native Teams for Cost-Conscious Startups

    Strong fit
    Native Teams
    Native Teams

    Best for: Micro and small startups making initial international hires.

    Verdict:

    Native Teams provides one of the absolute lowest published EOR list prices on the market, dramatically undercutting premium platforms. [25]

    Why it fits

    • EOR pricing flatly listed at $99/employee/month globally. [20]
    • Includes fundamental legal and payroll compliance. [29] [33]
    • Simple digital wallets bundled natively. [26]

    Fit considerations

    • Cost savings come with trade-offs like manual data entry (no HRIS syncs) and thinner compliance infrastructure outside Europe. [19] [41]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Employer of Record
    from $99
    per employee per month [20]
    See if Native Teams is the right fit
  2. Native Teams for European SMBs

    Strong fit
    Native Teams
    Native Teams

    Best for: SMBs hiring directly within the EU and Balkans.

    Verdict:

    A powerhouse for intra-Europe hiring and cross-border expansion, running directly through owned entities. [11] [28]

    Why it fits

    • Strong direct entity ownership across the EU and Balkans, including the UK, Germany, and France. [06] [08] [09]
    • Locally adapted employment contracts handling European complexity. [29]
    • HQ'd in London with strong continental coverage. [01] [11]

    Fit considerations

    • Expansion beyond Europe relies heavily on partner networks rather than native entities. [12] [41]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Employer of Record
    from $99
    per employee per month [20]
    See if Native Teams is the right fit
  3. Native Teams for Global Freelancer Networks

    Strong fit
    Native Teams
    Native Teams

    Best for: Companies managing high volumes of independent contractors.

    Verdict:

    Uniquely equipped to handle fast, compliant payouts to large networks of independent contractors and gig workers. [16] [39]

    Why it fits

    • Affordable $19/mo Contractor Pay tier. [21]
    • Provides multi-currency digital wallets and expense cards. [26] [30]
    • Specialized Gig Pay tier for high-volume automated payouts. [24]

    Fit considerations

    • Contractors are responsible for their own local taxes, though invoicing and cross-border transfers are fully managed. [21]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Contractor Pay
    from $19
    per contractor per month [21]
    See if Native Teams is the right fit

Native Teams Fit by Company Size

Native Teams is highly optimized for micro-businesses, small teams, and SMBs (1–200 employees) that prioritize budget and straightforward cross-border payments. [13] Its $99 per month EOR entry point makes it exceptionally accessible for early-stage companies making their first international hires. [20] [25] However, its value diminishes for larger mid-market and enterprise organizations (1,001+ employees). [14] Because the platform currently lacks an open API and does not offer native syncing with popular HRIS platforms like BambooHR or accounting tools like Xero, larger teams will likely find the required manual data exports too burdensome at scale. [19] [40]

Editorial verdict

Native Teams is strongest for startups and SMBs that need straightforward Employer of Record (EOR) services and contractor payments without the premium price tag. Its clearest advantage is its aggressive pricing—specifically the $99 per employee per month EOR tier and $19 per month contractor tier—which makes it particularly useful when a company is highly cost-conscious and primarily hiring within Europe, where Native Teams operates its own entities. [11] [20] [21]

The main trade-off is a lack of integration depth and automation. Native Teams does not currently offer an open API, nor does it natively sync with major HRIS or accounting platforms. [19] This matters most for mid-market and enterprise buyers, especially when managing a global workforce requires automated data flows to prevent manual entry errors and administrative bloat. [14] [40] Additionally, while European coverage is robust, coverage in regions like LATAM and APAC relies on partner networks, which may reduce direct control over the employee experience. [12] [41]

Choose Native Teams if budget is your primary constraint, you are hiring mostly in Europe, or you need a cost-effective way to pay a large network of international contractors using built-in digital wallets. Consider alternatives if you are hiring at scale across multiple continents, require enterprise-grade compliance history, or need deep HRIS integrations to manage your workforce. Before signing, verify the exact compliance documentation available, as third-party reviewers note conflicting evidence regarding public SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications. [18] [35]

Quick facts

FieldValue
VendorNative Teams [01]
Primary categoryEmployer of Record (EOR) [03]
Additional categoriesGlobal payroll, Contractor management, PEO [03]
Best-fit company sizeMicro (1–10), Small (11–50), SMB (51–200) [13]
Main use casesGlobal hiring, Contractor payments, Payroll processing [15] [16] [33]
Pricing modelPer employee/user per month, flat fee, quote-based [20] [23] [24]
Starting pricefrom $19 per user/month (official) [21]
Free plan/trialYes [20]
Primary marketsEU, Europe, GB [11]
Delivery modelMixed [11] [12]
Security/complianceGDPR [17]
Last verifiedJune 2026
Founded2020 [02]
HeadquartersGB [01]
Ownership statusPrivate [01]
Funding stageSeries A [02]
Key modulesEmployer of Record, Contractor of Record, Contractor Pay, Entity Management, Gig Pay [15] [16] [22] [23] [24]

What is Native Teams?

Native Teams is a global employment and payroll platform designed to help companies hire full-time employees and pay independent contractors across borders. [03] [15] [16] Headquartered in the UK, the platform acts as an Employer of Record (EOR), allowing businesses to employ staff in countries where they do not own a legal entity. [01] [15]

The platform is primarily used by startups, SMBs, and distributed teams looking for an affordable way to manage cross-border compliance, multi-currency payroll, and localized employment contracts. [28] [29] [34] Alongside its EOR capabilities, Native Teams offers specialized modules for contractor management, misclassification protection, and high-volume gig worker payouts, supported by embedded fintech features like virtual expense cards and multi-currency digital wallets. [22] [24] [26]

Who is Native Teams best for?

Best for

  • Budget-conscious startups and SMBs looking for one of the lowest EOR entry prices on the market. [20] [25]
  • European companies expanding across the EU and the UK, where Native Teams operates its own native entities. [11] [28]
  • Organizations managing mixed workforces of freelancers and employees that want to centralize payments and utilize digital wallets. [26] [39]

Not ideal for

  • Enterprises and larger mid-market companies that require automated HRIS workflows and native integrations with their existing tech stack. [14] [40]
  • Buyers seeking direct, owned-entity EOR infrastructure in regions like LATAM and APAC. [41]

Buyers should verify first

  • The availability of public SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 audit reports, as third-party reviews indicate these may not be publicly published despite vendor claims. [18] [35]
  • The exact partner used and the associated service levels for hires made outside of Europe. [12] [41]
  • How manual data exports will affect your HR team's workload, given the lack of an open API. [19]

Products and modules

  • Employer of Record (EOR): Allows companies to employ and pay full-time employees across 95+ countries without setting up local entities. Includes localized contracts, tax filings, and statutory benefits. [15] [20] [29]
  • Contractor of Record: Provides end-to-end misclassification protection and localized contracts for independent workers, bypassing the complexities of formal employment. [22] [31]
  • Contractor Pay: A payment management solution for global freelancers, featuring multi-currency payouts, digital wallets, and expense cards. [16] [21] [26]
  • Entity Management: A dashboard and compliance support module for companies that want to manage their own established legal entities, with pricing starting at a flat monthly fee plus country-specific setup costs. [23]
  • Gig Pay: A custom-priced service designed for high-volume, automated payouts to gig workers. [24]

Features and capabilities

Capability summary: Native Teams is strongest in its core EOR and contractor payment capabilities, particularly its embedded fintech tools like multi-currency wallets and expense cards. [15] [26] Buyers should verify the depth of global payroll automation, as the lack of integrations means data must largely be managed manually. [19]

CapabilityStatusEvidence strengthNotesSource
Employer of RecordStrongStrongProvides full-time employment across 95+ countries.[15]
Local employment contractsStrongStrongCountry-specific contracts aligned with local labor laws.[29]
Worker misclassificationSupportedStrongOffered via the Contractor of Record module.[31]
Visa supportSupportedStrongWork visa and relocation support across 65+ countries.[32]
Global payrollSupportedStrongProcessing for global workforces.[33]
Contractor paymentsStrongStrongPay contractors globally with multi-currency options.[16]
Multi-currency walletsSupportedStrongStore, convert, and spend via physical and virtual cards.[26] [30]

Pricing

Native Teams offers highly visible, public pricing for most of its tiers, operating primarily on a per-user, per-month model. [20] [21]

Employer of Record (EOR) Pricing

Employer of Record
Starts at $99per employee per month

local contracts, payroll processing, tax filings, statutory benefits, and one free admin account. [20]

Contractor Management Pricing

Contractor Pay
Starts at $19per contractor per month

global payouts, multi-currency wallet, and expense cards. [21]

Contractor of Record
Starts at $99per contractor per month

misclassification protection and localized contracts. [22]

Entity Management Pricing

Entity Management
Starts at $149per month

entity dashboard and compliance support. [23]

Gig Worker Pricing

Gig Pay
Quote-based

high-volume payouts and an automated system. [24]

Region and country coverage

Native Teams supports hiring in 95+ countries using a mixed delivery model. [11] [12] [15]

Buyers should verify the specific partner arrangements for any hires made outside of Europe, as third-party analysts note that compliance depth and operational tracking are thinner in partner-dependent regions like LATAM and APAC. [41]

Region/countryCapabilityCoverage typeEvidence statusNotesSource
United KingdomEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongVendor HQ with owned entity.[01] [06]
GermanyEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongDirect owned entity.[08]
FranceEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongDirect owned entity.[09]
NetherlandsEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongDirect owned entity.[07]
SpainEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongDirect owned entity.[10]
Rest of EUEOR, Payroll, ComplianceNativeStrongDirect entities across the EU block (e.g., IE, BE, SE).[11]
United StatesEOR, Payroll, CompliancePartnerStrongDelivered via partner network.[04]
CanadaEOR, Payroll, CompliancePartnerStrongDelivered via partner network.[05]
LATAMEOR, Payroll, CompliancePartnerStrongPartner-dependent (e.g., BR, MX, CO).[12]
APACEOR, Payroll, CompliancePartnerStrongPartner-dependent (e.g., IN, SG, AU).[12]

EOR coverage

Native Teams offers EOR services across 95+ countries. [15] The platform handles legal employment, localized contracts, and compliance responsibilities directly in Europe and the Balkans, where it operates its own entities. [11] [29] Outside of these core regions, it relies on third-party in-country partners to act as the legal employer. [12] Visa and relocation support is bundled as part of the service in 65+ countries. [32]

Payroll coverage

The platform supports global payroll for both full-time employees and independent contractors. [16] [33] A standout feature is its native multi-currency functionality, which allows users to store, convert, and spend funds using digital wallets and physical or virtual debit cards. [26] [30] Buyers should note that without an open API or native accounting integrations, payroll consolidation into external general ledgers requires manual data exports. [19]

Contractor management

Native Teams provides comprehensive contractor management through two distinct tiers. The basic "Contractor Pay" tier ($19/month) handles multi-currency invoicing and global payouts. [21] [30] For teams needing higher compliance security, the "Contractor of Record" tier ($99/month) adds end-to-end misclassification protection and localized contractor agreements. [22] [31]

Integrations

Integration depth is a major limitation for Native Teams. According to third-party analysts, the platform currently lacks an open API and does not natively sync with popular HRIS or accounting platforms. [19]

Because integrations are not supported natively, buyers should verify how much manual administrative work will be required to keep their HR and finance systems updated. [19]

IntegrationCategorySupport levelEvidence strengthNotesSource
BambooHRHRISNot supportedStrongRequires manual data exports.[19]
XeroAccountingNot supportedStrongRequires manual data exports.[19]
GreenhouseATSNot supportedStrongNo native sync available.[19]
SlackCommunicationNot supportedMediumLimited third-party integrations overall.[19]

Security and compliance

According to the vendor's legal and security pages, Native Teams lists the following compliance standards: Note: Buyers should request direct copies of the SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 audit reports from the vendor to verify compliance before purchasing, given the conflicting third-party evidence. [18] [35]

  • GDPR: Native Teams follows strict data protection protocols and complies with global privacy standards, including GDPR. [17]
  • SOC 2: The vendor claims SOC 2 compliance, but third-party reviewers state there is no public attestation or certification published. [18]
  • ISO 27001: The vendor claims ISO compliance, but third-party reviewers state there is no public certification published. [35]

Implementation and support

Evidence regarding implementation timelines is limited, but reviews indicate that dedicated account management (CSM) is included in the platform's higher tiers or offered as an add-on service. [27]

Implementation and Support Strengths

ProWhy it mattersEvidenceCaveat
Highly affordable entry pointReduces the financial barrier for startups making international hires.The $99/employee/month EOR rate is significantly lower than major competitors like Deel or Remote. [20] [25]Cost savings come with trade-offs in automation and integration depth. [19]
Embedded FintechSimplifies cross-border spending and currency conversion for workers.Built-in financial features include dedicated multi-currency wallets and physical/virtual expense cards. [26] [30]None.

Implementation and Support Limitations

ConWhy it mattersEvidenceCaveat
Lack of integrationsIncreases manual data entry and administrative burden at scale.Complete lack of an open API and no native syncing with popular HRIS or accounting platforms (e.g., BambooHR, Xero). [19]May not impact micro-businesses that do not use complex HRIS tools. [13]
Global Coverage DepthReduces direct control and visibility over compliance outside of Europe.Coverage is robust in Europe via owned entities, but is partner-dependent in regions like LATAM and APAC. [11] [12] [41]Perfectly suitable if hiring is restricted to the EU/UK. [28]

Is Native Teams Right for Your Team?

AI recommendations may include mistakes. See how we review platforms

Buyer checklist

Before purchasing Native Teams, buyers should verify:

  • Confirm exact pricing and any hidden setup fees for Entity Management or Gig Pay.
  • Verify which specific partner is used for EOR coverage in your target countries outside of Europe.
  • Ask for direct copies of SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 audit reports to validate data security claims.
  • Validate how much manual work will be required to export payroll data into your accounting software.
  • Confirm whether your specific EOR tier includes a dedicated Customer Success Manager.
  • Review the specific local benefits packages available in partner-dependent countries.

Native Teams Alternatives to Consider

Native Teams is strongest for budget-conscious startups and SMBs that want affordable EOR services and multi-currency contractor payments, particularly when hiring within Europe. It is less ideal for enterprises requiring deep HRIS automation or direct owned-entity coverage globally. [14] [28] [41]

Consider these alternatives based on your main priority:

  • Deel - Choose Deel if hiring globally across many continents, needing deep HRIS integrations (100+ native integrations), and enterprise-grade compliance history. Deel is vastly more expensive but provides superior automation, wider direct country coverage, and deep API access. [36]
  • Remote - Choose Remote if you need strict IP protection, deeply localized benefits packages, and broader owned-entity coverage globally. Remote offers owned entities in more markets globally than Native Teams, but at a higher price tier ($599 vs $99). [37]
  • Teamed - Choose Teamed if you are a fast-growing company wanting fully transparent FX invoicing, guaranteed human HR expert access, and an integration to existing HRIS systems. Teamed provides transparent FX at zero markup and HRIS integrations, while Native Teams wins strictly on the $99 EOR price and contractor wallet capabilities. [38]
Bottom line: Native Teams is the better choice if your main priority is securing the lowest possible EOR list price or providing digital wallets to a network of contractors. If your main problem is global HRIS automation, enterprise compliance, or direct-entity coverage outside of Europe, one of the alternatives above may be a better fit.

Where Native Teams fits best

Native Teams fits best with micro-businesses, small startups, and SMBs that are highly cost-conscious and primarily looking to hire talent within Europe and the UK. [13] [28] Its single strongest scenario is serving as a low-cost EOR ($99/month) for European expansion or as a payment platform for global freelancers who benefit from the platform's multi-currency digital wallets and expense cards. [20] [26] Mid-market and enterprise buyers seeking automated HRIS workflows, open APIs, and direct-entity EOR coverage across LATAM and APAC should look elsewhere. [14] [19] [40]

FAQ

Research confidence

FieldValue
Confidence score95/100
Number and mix of sources10 sources (5 vendor-owned, 5 third-party)
Strongest evidence areasPricing, European coverage, Contractor features
Claims buyers should verifyPublic availability of SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, exact partner used outside of Europe.
Last verifiedJune 2026
Methodology and sourcesMethodology · Sources

How we reviewed this article:

We review vendor pages regularly and update them as pricing, coverage, and capabilities evolve.

Current VersionJun 26, 2026
Updated ByAleksandra Jotic
May 24, 2026
Written ByHR.software Editorial Team