Site Logo

Lano Review 2026: Pricing, EOR, Global Payroll, Pros, and Cons

Last Updated: 26 Jun 2026
Aleksandra Jotic
HR Strategy & Operations Advisor | HRIS, Training & Organisational Development
Built with HR and software expert input using a structured evaluation process
View more
Advertising Disclosure

Lano is a strong fit for mid-market and enterprise organizations needing to consolidate multi-country payroll from existing local providers into a single dashboard. [69] Its clearest advantage is the ability to orchestrate external payroll processors without forcing a rip-and-replace, while paying international workers via its built-in wallet. [69] [70] It is less suited for companies seeking deep native currency support for contractors globally or an EOR with 100% owned legal entities. [71] [73]

Strengths

  • Unified payroll consolidation, multi-currency wallet

Limitations

  • 100% partner entity model, flat pricing scales steeply for enterprises, limited currency breadth

Best for

Companies consolidating global payroll

Best for mid-market and enterprise companies consolidating global payroll across existing third-party providers and new EOR hires.

  • SMB
  • Mid-market
  • Enterprise
  • Global payroll
  • EOR
  • Contractor management
  1. Lano for Global Payroll Consolidators

    Strong fit
    Lano
    Lano

    Best for: Finance teams unifying 3+ external payroll processors

    Verdict:

    Ideal for finance teams trying to unify data across 3+ external payroll processors. [75]

    Why it fits

    • Platform is purpose-built to ingest data from third-party local payroll providers. [75]
    • Consolidated reporting provides a single source of truth for global workforce costs. [75]
    • Reduces manual month-end reconciliation via automated HRIS syncing. [75]

    Fit considerations

    • Implementation heavily depends on third-party payroll providers granting API access or supporting automated file exports. [75]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Payroll consolidation
    from € 3
    /employee/month [63]
    See if Lano is the right fit
  2. Lano for European Mid-Market Tech Companies

    Strong fit
    Lano
    Lano

    Best for: EU-centric teams managing employees and international contractors

    Verdict:

    Perfect for EU-centric teams managing a mix of employees and international contractors. [76]

    Why it fits

    • Headquartered in Germany with native GDPR compliance and data residency. [76]
    • Highly competitive EUR 19/month rate for managing international contractors. [76]
    • Strong documentation and compliance support for complex European markets like Germany and France. [76]

    Fit considerations

    • Currency support for paying contractors outside of major markets is limited compared to competitors. [76]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Contractor Management
    from € 19
    /contractor/month [65]
    See if Lano is the right fit
  3. Lano for Companies Blending EOR and Owned Entities

    Strong fit
    Lano
    Lano

    Best for: Hybrid setups combining owned entities and EORs

    Verdict:

    Designed to handle hybrid setups where companies have their own entities in some countries but use EORs in others. [77]

    Why it fits

    • Aggregates payroll from owned entities and Lano EOR hires in the exact same view. [77]
    • Includes the Lano Wallet for efficiently transferring funds between international entities. [77]
    • Provides modular pricing so you only pay for the software layer in countries where you already have a payroll processor. [77]

    Fit considerations

    • Requires a dedicated setup phase to map all external systems into the dashboard. [77]
    EXPERT REVIEW

    Pricing benchmark:

    Multi-Country Payroll
    from € 19
    /employee/month [64]
    See if Lano is the right fit

Lano Fit by Company Size

Lano is strongest for mid-market and enterprise organizations (51 to 10,000 employees) that are expanding globally and need to orchestrate payroll across multiple countries. [43] While it can support smaller teams, the complexity of multi-country payroll consolidation is often unnecessary for businesses with fewer than 50 employees, making it only a medium fit for micro and small businesses.

Editorial verdict

Lano is strongest for mid-market and enterprise companies that need to consolidate global payroll data across multiple existing local processors and new EOR hires. [74] Its clearest advantage is its unified dashboard and multi-currency wallet, which makes it particularly useful when a business wants to orchestrate payroll without ripping and replacing existing local providers. [69] [70]

The main trade-off is its reliance on a 100% partner entity model for Employer of Record services. [71] This matters most for businesses that require strict intellectual property protection or prefer the direct compliance control of a vendor with owned entities. [71] [79] Additionally, flat per-employee pricing can scale steeply for very large enterprise headcounts. [72]

Choose Lano if unifying existing payroll providers and blending them with EOR hires is your top priority. Consider alternatives if you need owned-entity EOR infrastructure or broader currency support for deep emerging-market contractor payments. [73] [78] Before signing, verify API compatibility and data-export capabilities with your existing local payroll providers.

Quick facts

FieldValue
VendorLano [01]
Primary categoryGlobal payroll [05]
Additional categoriesEOR, Contractor management, Payroll software [04] [06] [07]
Best-fit company sizeSMB (51–200), Midmarket (201–1,000), Enterprise (1,001–10,000) [43] [44] [45]
Main use casesConsolidate global payroll, multi-currency salary payments, hire global employees without legal entities [04] [05] [06]
Pricing modelPer employee per month, per user per month [63] [64] [65]
Starting pricefrom €3 /employee/month (official) [63]
Free plan/trialNot publicly stated
Primary marketsGlobal, Europe [08] [76]
Delivery modelPartner-delivered [71]
Security/complianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR [55] [56]
Last verifiedJune 2026
Founded2018 [03]
HeadquartersBerlin, Germany [01]
Ownership statusPrivate
Customer count2,000 [02]

What is Lano?

Lano is a global workforce management platform headquartered in Berlin, Germany. It provides software and services to help companies hire, pay, and manage international employees and contractors. [04] [05] [07]

Its core offering centers around global payroll consolidation, allowing businesses to aggregate data from their existing third-party local payroll providers into a single unified dashboard. [06] [69] Alongside its consolidation software, Lano provides Employer of Record (EOR) services via a network of local partners, enabling companies to hire employees in 170+ countries without establishing their own legal entities. [04] [08] The platform also features a multi-currency digital wallet for processing international payments. [70]

Who is Lano best for?

Best for

  • Growing and mid-market companies that want to consolidate multiple global payroll providers into a single dashboard. [74]
  • Distributed teams that need to blend EOR hires with employees managed by owned entities. [77]
  • European tech and e-commerce companies managing a mix of international employees and contractors. [76]

Not ideal for

  • Companies seeking an EOR that operates its own legal entities globally. [71]
  • Organizations needing to pay contractors in more than 50 currencies, especially in emerging markets. [73]
  • Small businesses with under 50 employees that do not need complex multi-country payroll aggregation.

Buyers should verify first

  • Integration depth and API access for existing third-party payroll providers. [75]
  • Total costs at scale, as flat per-employee fees can grow steeply. [72]
  • The specific partner entities used in target EOR countries. [71]

Products and modules

  • Lano Payroll Consolidation: A standalone software platform designed to aggregate data from existing third-party payroll providers, standardizing global payroll reporting into one dashboard. [06]
  • Lano Multi-Country Payroll: An outsourced global payroll service that utilizes Lano's local partners to process multi-currency salary payments. [05]
  • Lano Employer of Record: An EOR service allowing businesses to hire global employees without setting up local legal entities, managing international compliance and benefits. [04]
  • Lano Contractor Management: A module to onboard and pay international freelancers and generate compliant contractor agreements. [07]

Features and capabilities

Capability summary: Lano is strongest in payroll consolidation and multi-currency payments. [52] [53] Buyers should verify exact currency availability for contractor payments, as the platform natively supports 28 currencies, which may limit flexibility in certain emerging markets compared to competitors. [73]

CapabilityStatusEvidence strengthNotesSource
Employer of RecordSupportedStrongHires managed via a 100% partner entity network.[47] [71]
Multi-country payrollSupportedStrongConsolidates existing local providers into one dashboard.[52]
Global payrollSupportedStrongOutsourced payroll processing via local partners.[51]
Multi-currency payrollSupportedStrongPays teams in 28 currencies via the Lano Wallet.[53]
Contractor paymentsSupportedStrongEmbedded payments solution for global contractors.[54]
OnboardingSupportedStrongAutomated onboarding flows.[48]
Statutory benefitsSupportedStrongProvides locally compliant contracts and country-specific benefits.[50]
Visa supportSupportedStrongIncluded as part of the EOR package.[49]

Pricing

Lano provides public pricing for its main modules. [63] Pricing is structured on a per-employee or per-contractor basis, with separate tiers depending on the level of service required.

Payroll Software Pricing

Payroll consolidation
Start at € 3per employee per month

dashboard control, HRIS and finance integrations, multi-entity reporting, PTO tracking, and expense management. [63]

Global Payroll Pricing

Multi-Country Payroll
Start at € 19per employee per month

outsourced processing via local partners in 170+ countries, multi-entity reporting, and HRIS integrations. [64]

Contractor Management Pricing

Contractor Management
Start at € 19per contractor per month

compliant contracts, contractor invoicing, and multi-currency payments. [65]

Employer of Record (EOR) Pricing

Employer of Record
Start at € 499per employee per month

compliant employment contracts, local tax and HR expertise, visa support, PTO tracking, and expense management. [66]

Payments Pricing

SWIFT Payments
€ 25flat fee per transaction

cross-border SWIFT payments when local free payment networks are unavailable. [67]

Region and country coverage

Lano supports 170+ countries globally. [08] The vendor utilizes a 100% partner delivery model, meaning it does not own its own legal entities in the countries it serves. [71]

Note: Additional countries supported via the partner network include Belgium, Ireland, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Poland, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Uruguay, Hong Kong, China, Japan, New Zealand, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and South Africa. [16] to [42]

Region/CountryCapabilityCoverage typeEvidence statusSource
United StatesEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerVerified[08]
United KingdomEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerVerified[09]
GermanyEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerVerified[10]
NetherlandsEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerVerified[11]
FranceEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerVerified[12]
AustraliaEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerInferred[13]
CanadaEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerInferred[14]
SpainEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerInferred[15]
IndiaEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerInferred[33]
SingaporeEOR, Global payroll, Contractor paymentsPartnerInferred[34]

EOR coverage

Lano's Employer of Record service is available in 170+ countries. [08] The vendor relies entirely on an established partner network to deliver these services, meaning Lano acts as the software layer while third-party local partners serve as the legal employer. [71] Buyers should verify the specific compliance responsibilities and service levels of the local partner in their target hiring markets.

Payroll coverage

Lano supports global payroll processing through its local partner network and offers multi-currency salary payments in 28 currencies. [51] [53] Additionally, its payroll consolidation software allows companies to aggregate payroll data from existing third-party providers into a single multi-country dashboard. [52]

Contractor management

The platform supports onboarding and paying international freelancers. [54] It generates compliant contractor agreements and facilitates multi-currency payments. [07] [54] However, its native support for 28 currencies may be limited for paying contractors in emerging markets when compared to competitors that support 120+ currencies. [73]

Integrations

Integration summary: Lano demonstrates strong integration capabilities with major HRIS and accounting platforms. [59] [60] [61] Buyers should verify the exact technical depth of the BambooHR integration, as third-party reviews conflict on whether it is a native application or relies on an API connection. [57]

IntegrationCategorySupport levelEvidence strengthNotesSource
BambooHRHRISNativeConflictingSources conflict on whether this is a native app or API integration.[57]
WorkdayHRISAPIStrongAPI-led integration.[58]
PersonioHRISNativeStrongNative integration.[59]
HiBobHRISNativeStrongNative integration.[60]
QuickBooksAccountingNativeStrongNative integration.[61]
XeroAccountingNativeStrongNative integration.[62]

Security and compliance

According to the vendor, Lano maintains several key security and compliance certifications:

  • SOC 2: Lano holds SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II certifications, audited by Sensiba LLP. [55]
  • GDPR: As a European company headquartered in Germany, Lano complies with GDPR regulations for secure data processing within the EU. [56]

Implementation and support

Lano provides dedicated account managers for each client to support ongoing operations and implementation. [68]

Implementation and Support Strengths

ProWhy it mattersEvidenceCaveat
Unified Payroll ConsolidationAllows businesses to orchestrate external payroll providers under one dashboard without ripping and replacing existing setups.[69]Heavy reliance on third-party API capabilities.
Multi-Currency Lano WalletSupports free local payments and inter-subsidiary fund transfers across 28+ currencies, reducing FX loss.[70]Limited to the supported 28 currencies.

Implementation and Support Limitations

ConWhy it mattersEvidenceCaveat
100% Partner Entity ModelRelies entirely on an established partner network, which poses a risk of variable service quality and compliance execution compared to owned-entity EORs.[71]-
Cost at ScaleFlat per-employee fees can scale steeply as enterprise headcount grows, compared to volume-discounted SaaS models.[72]-
Limited Currency BreadthSupports roughly 28 currencies natively, limiting flexibility for contractor payments in emerging markets compared to competitors offering 120+.[73]-

Is Lano Right for Your Team?

AI recommendations may include mistakes. See how we review platforms

Lano Alternatives to Consider

Lano is strongest for mid-market and enterprise buyers who need to aggregate legacy local payroll providers alongside new EOR hires in a single dashboard. It is less ideal for buyers who prioritize an EOR with wholly owned legal entities or deep currency support for contractors. [74] [78] [79]

Consider these alternatives based on your main priority:

  • Deel - Choose Deel if you need rapid EOR onboarding, highly reliable global coverage via 100+ owned entities, or free contractor management with 120+ local currencies. Deel provides better overall geographical maturity and contractor value, while Lano is stronger for consolidating existing local payroll providers. [78]
  • Remote - Choose Remote if you prioritize strict Intellectual Property (IP) protection via 100% owned legal entities in coverage areas. Lano relies entirely on a partner network for EOR, making Remote a better fit for IP-sensitive tech companies, whereas Lano is better for managing multi-country payroll across independent providers. [79]
Bottom line: Lano is the better choice if your main priority is orchestrating multiple existing local payroll processors and blending them with new EOR hires. If your main priority is strict IP protection, owned-entity EOR infrastructure, or broad emerging-market contractor payments, one of the alternatives above may be a better fit.

Where Lano fits best

Lano fits best for mid-market and enterprise organizations, particularly European tech companies, that need to consolidate global payroll data across multiple existing local processors and new EOR hires. [74] [76] It is the strongest choice when a finance team wants a unified dashboard and multi-currency wallet without abandoning its legacy regional payroll providers. [69] Organizations seeking an EOR with entirely owned legal entities or extensive currency support for global contractors should look elsewhere. [71] [73]

Buyer checklist

  • Confirm exact pricing for the buyer’s specific employee and contractor count to forecast costs at scale.
  • Validate API integration depth and automated file export capabilities for all existing local payroll providers you intend to consolidate.
  • Verify the specific partner entities Lano uses in your target EOR hiring countries.
  • Confirm that the 28 natively supported currencies cover your expected contractor payment locations.
  • Review SOC 2 Type II documentation and GDPR compliance measures.
  • Ask about the implementation timeline required to map external payroll systems into the Lano dashboard.
  • Confirm SWIFT transfer fee volume if local payment networks are unavailable in your target markets.

FAQ

Research confidence

FieldValue
Confidence score90/100
Number and mix of sources11 sources (6 vendor-owned, 5 third-party)
Strongest evidence areasPayroll consolidation features, pricing, and integrations
Claims buyers should verifyAPI availability for third-party payroll providers and exact currency support for target contractor locations
Last verifiedJune 2026
Methodology and sourcesMethodology · Sources

How we reviewed this article:

We review vendor pages regularly and update them as pricing, coverage, and capabilities evolve.

Current VersionJun 26, 2026
Updated ByAleksandra Jotic
Jun 25, 2026
Updated ByAleksandra Jotic
May 24, 2026
Written ByHR.software Editorial Team