It’s no longer science fiction: artificial intelligence, robotics and advanced automation are reshaping how, where and by whom work gets done. According to the WEF’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, some 86% of businesses expect AI and information-processing technologies to transform their operations by 2030.

At the same time, the report projects a net gain of around 78 million jobs globally between now and 2030, yet simultaneously estimates that 92 million roles may be displaced during that period.

So, yes: while the overall job count may still rise, the detailed picture underneath is turbulent. Many roles will vanish or shrink, others will transform, and new ones will emerge. For HR leaders, talent strategists and workforce planners this means one major question: which jobs are at highest risk  and what should we do now?

What the Data Says: Risk, Replacement & Resilience

The cornerstone of forecasting automation risk lies in analyzing tasks, not just jobs. According to MGI, at least 75 million to 375 million workers may need to switch occupational categories globally by 2030 because of automation or AI.

Another study from the Organization for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD) showed that while overall employment grew over the past decade in 21 countries, jobs deemed high risk of automation only grew 6% versus 18% for low-risk jobs. That signals a disparity of future opportunity.

Key macro-drivers the WEF identifies for the 2025-30 transformation include:

• Technological change & generative AI
  
• Demographic shifts (aging workforce)
  
• Geoeconomic fragmentation & uncertainty
  
• Green transition & sustainability agendas

Combining these forecast elements, we can identify which types of jobs are most vulnerable and which are more likely to evolve or survive.

Top 10 Jobs Most Likely to Be Automated by 2030

Below is a distilled list of roles judged at higher risk for replacement or radical transformation by AI and automation by 2030. Note: exact percentages vary by study, but the pattern is consistent.

While precise risk ratings (e.g., 85 % likelihood) vary by source, this spread reflects the consensus signals in reports by WEF, McKinsey and others. For example, the WEF article “Fastest-growing and declining jobs” highlights that clerical and administrative workers are among the fastest-declining categories.

The Surprising Survivors: What Jobs AI Can’t Easily Replace?

It’s not all doom. Often overlooked: jobs that combine complex judgement, emotional intelligence, manual dexterity or human connection are much more resilient to full automation. Some examples:

• Teachers, therapists, social care workers
  
• Skilled trades (electricians, plumbers)
  
• HR consultants, organizational coaches
  
• Creative professionals (designers, artists)
  

Why? Because these roles involve subtle human attributes: empathy, ethics, improvisation, trust, relationship-building, which machines struggle to replicate at scale. In short, the value proposition shifts from task replacement to human augmentation.

The Global Divide in Automation Risk

Automation isn’t uniform. According to the WEF and OECD, countries and sectors will experience differing exposure. For example:

• In higher-income economies, repetitive administrative or middle-skilled roles carry higher exposure.
  
• In lower-income economies, many workers are in informal or non-automated roles, but face vulnerability because of lower skill ceilings and less ability to up-skill.
  
• The OECD found low-educated workers were more likely to be in high-risk jobs and so far their employment growth lags behind more educated workers.

The Bain & Company piece “Labor 2030” estimated that the U.S. alone might need 20-25 % fewer workers in certain segments unless retraining happens — roughly 30-40 million jobs.

Hence: for global HR and talent leaders, geography, sector and workforce demographics must shape automation strategy — one size does not fit all.

AI isn’t just replacing… it’s re-wiring work

It’s easy to think of automation as job destruction; the fuller story is more nuanced. Roles are transforming, being re-shaped, and new ones are emerging. The WEF predicts 170 million new roles by 2030.

Here are some emerging hybrid roles:

• AI prompt engineers: humans designing and validating prompts for AI systems
  
• Automation ethicists / auditors: oversight for large-scale AI systems
  
• Digital process designers: configuring workflows combining human+machine
  
• Human-AI collaboration facilitators: roles that bridge technical tools & human teams
  

From this perspective, the message to HR: it’s not just which jobs are lost, but which jobs are created — and how your workforce can be ready for both.

How are Companies Responding and What HR Must Do?

With disruption coming faster than ever, many companies are taking action. The McKinsey piece “Retraining & Reskilling Workers in the Age of Automation” emphasises that reskilling is no longer optional: up to 375 million people may need occupational transitions by 2030.

What HR and talent teams should prioritize:

• Skills analytics & workforce-planning tools: Identify high-risk roles and plan transitions now
  
• Reskilling/adaptation programs: Blend tech, creativity, emotional/social skills
  
• Job redesign: Shift from full-time models of replace-or-no to human+machine workflows
  
• Diversity & inclusion lenses: Since automation risk often disproportionately impacts lower-skilled or under-represented workers
  
• Tracking automation exposure: Use dashboards and alerts — not just for compliance but for talent strategy
  

The WEF report emphasizes that the skills gap is the greatest barrier to transformation: 63% of employers say skills are the top obstacle.

For companies, the automation wave becomes a talent wave — managing not just systems, but people, culture and capability.

The Future of Work is Still Human!

Despite the numbers and automation headlines, human workers are far from irrelevant. The key insight: machines may take tasks, but humans still bring purpose.

Here’s what that means:

• Automation risk is highest where work is routine, low-complexity, rule-based
  
• Automation resilience comes where work involves judgement, empathy, creativity, physical dexterity, strategic thinking
  
• The future workforce will be adaptive, not fixed: people moving between roles, combining human+machine, leveraging lifelong learning
  

This points toward a new narrative: instead of “jobs replaced by AI”, think “jobs transformed by AI”. The challenge for HR is to ensure that transformation is inclusive, strategic, and human-centered.

‍